When does an applicant have to provide evidence of being admissible?

An applicant must provide evidence of being admissible when there is evidence of potential inadmissibility. This requirement exists because U.S. immigration law specifies that certain factors can render an individual inadmissible, such as specific criminal convictions, health-related issues, or security concerns. When an applicant's background or situation raises any doubts about their admissibility, the burden of proof shifts to them to demonstrate that they do not fall under the categories of inadmissibility.

For example, if there are indications or reports of a previous criminal conviction or health issue, the applicant must present evidence to negate those concerns or clarify their situation. This could include court documents showing that charges were resolved or medical records showing that a health condition does not affect their admissibility.

In contrast, during a visa renewal or when applying for employment, there may not be the same level of scrutiny regarding admissibility unless there are specific concerns raised in the application process or upon review of the applicant's history. If someone has previously been deported, while they may encounter certain issues during the application process, that's not the same as having to prove admissibility beyond doubt unless new evidence of potential inadmissibility arises. Thus, evidence of admissibility is primarily essential when there are indications or documentation suggesting potential